|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc
Tribal Band
440
   |
Posted - 2013.04.18 06:59:00 -
[1] - Quote
Fonac wrote:What does signature resolution mean?
Signature resolution is a weapon's "anchor point" for signature radius calculations. When numbers on the weapon rely on the target's signature radius (such as tracking), then when the target's signature radius is equal to the weapon's signature resolution, the number is the listed value. For instance, a large turret has a signature resolution of 400m. If it fires at a target with a 400m signature radius, it gets 100% of the listed tracking value. If it fires at a target with a 2000m signature radius, it gets 500% of listed tracking.
I don't think missiles use signature resolution.
Mittani, where have you gone to? I miss you :( |
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc
Tribal Band
440
|
Posted - 2013.04.18 15:03:00 -
[2] - Quote
Bucca Zerodyme wrote:Reaver Glitterstim wrote:Fonac wrote:What does signature resolution mean?
I don't think missiles use signature resolution. Obviously its good to use TP, it increase your DPS a lot. Explosion velocity increase your DPS too, but the primary dmg indicator is the signature of the ship. Correct. Signature resolution on turrets is sort of like explosion radius on missiles.
Mittani, where have you gone to? I miss you :( |
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc
Tribal Band
440
|
Posted - 2013.04.19 02:25:00 -
[3] - Quote
Enya Sparhawk wrote:Wouldn't it stand to reason that a cruise would hit/detonate on a target at 0m sig radius as oppose to 2000m sig (as given in the example above) since it has guidance and enough speed to achieve it? (As oppose to a torp which is unguided) Guided is a categorical identifier to set long range missiles apart from short range. There is no functional difference. They can all hit a target with a signature radius of zero, and will deal no damage to it at all regardless of its velocity.
Mittani, where have you gone to? I miss you :( |
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc
Tribal Band
440
|
Posted - 2013.04.20 00:08:00 -
[4] - Quote
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0108/phobos_vik1_r1.jpg
http://www.thunderbolts.info/tpod/2008/image08/080121mial-mimas.gif
These holes were put there by objects much smaller which did not explode on impact. They were like bullets. Very FAST bullets.
Mittani, where have you gone to? I miss you :( |
Reaver Glitterstim
Dromedaworks inc
Tribal Band
440
|
Posted - 2013.04.20 06:43:00 -
[5] - Quote
Funky Lazers wrote:It looks shopped, I can tell from some of the pixels and from seeing quite a few shops in my time. It's a low quality GIF that accurately represents a video that is fake. The fake video depicts a very real weapon firing in a very realistic manner, and shows an accurate representation of the weapon's destructive potential. Also, sound apparently travels at the speed of light in the video. It's also entirely a bad way to represent the original point, which was to suggest that bullets can be as damaging as explosives. Since the high-damage weapon in the GIF is using explosive ammunition, it demonstrates nothing about non-explosive ammunition.
Mittani, where have you gone to? I miss you :( |
|
|
| |
|